Hot News
| Pronouncement of the Final Decision Regarding the Investigation concerning Beypazarı İçecek Pazarlama Dağıtım Ambalaj Turizm Petrol İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ According to Article 49 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition | 26.5.2022 | ||
| Within the scope of the investigation conducted per the Competition Board decision dated 24.02.2022 and numbered 22-10/140-M, in the settlement text, which is sent by Beypazarı İçecek Pazarlama Dağıtım Ambalaj Turizm Petrol İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ within the framework of the interim Board decision dated 29.04.2022 and numbered 22-20/336-MUA and entered into the registry of the Authority on 13.05.2022 with the number 27971, the undertaking clearly accepted the rate and amount of the maximum a... | |||
| Read | |||
| Pronouncement of the Final Decision Regarding the Investigation about Kınık Maden Suları AŞ According to Article 49 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition | 26.5.2022 | ||
| Within the scope of the investigation conducted per the Competition Board decision dated 24.02.2022 and numbered 22-10/140-M in order to determine whether Beypazarı İçecek Pazarlama Dağıtım Ambalaj Turizm Petrol İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and Kınık Maden Suları AŞ violated article 4 of the Act no 4054; in the settlement text, which was sent by Kınık Maden Suları AŞ within the framework of the interim Board decision dated 07.04.2022 and numbered 22-16/259-MUA and entered into the registry of the... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning Petrol Ofisi Havacılık Operasyonları A.Ş., THY Opet Havacılık Yakıtları A.Ş. and Triple Star Aviation Ltd. was initiated upon the decision of 8th Administrative Law Chamber of Ankara Regional Administrative Court (17.5.2022) | 18.5.2022 | ||
| Upon the decision of 8th Administrative Law Chamber of Ankara Regional Administrative Court, the Competition Board reevaluated the claim that Petrol Ofisi Havacılık Operasyonları A.Ş., THY Opet Havacılık Yakıtları A.Ş. and Triple Star Aviation Ltd. violated articles 4 and 6 of the Act no 4054 through their practices in the market for supplying fuel to private jets. Previously, as a result of the preliminary inquiry made about the claim in question, the Board took the decision dated 01.11.2018... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning Etiya Bilgi Teknolojileri Yazılım Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., Pia Bilişim Hizmetleri A.Ş., İnnova Bilişim Çözümleri A.Ş., NETAŞ Telekomünikasyon A.Ş., MAGİS Teknoloji A.Ş., Kafein Yazılım Hizmetleri Tic. A.Ş. and RDC Partner Bilişim Danışmanlık ve Teknoloji Hizmetleri A.Ş. Initiated (9.5.2022) | 18.5.2022 | ||
| The Competition Board concluded the preliminary inquiry conducted upon the claim that article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition was violated by means of gentlemen’s agreements in the labor market. Having discussed the information and documents acquired and observations made in the preliminary inquiry in its meeting of 21.04.2022, the Competition Board concluded that the findings were significant and sufficient, and took the decision no 22-18/301-M to initiate an investiga... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning EAE Elektrik Asansör Endüstrisi İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. Initiated upon the Decision of Ankara 7th Administrative Court | 18.5.2022 | ||
| The Competition Board reevaluated the claim that EAE Elektrik Asansör Endüstrisi İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. made misleading and discrediting statements about the complainant’s products to customers and made the customers buy its products upon the decision of the Ankara 7th Administrative Court. Previously, as a result of the preliminary inquiry about the claims in question, the Board took the decision dated 12.11.2019 and numbered 19-39/603-257 that it was not necessary to initiate an inve... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning seven undertakings producing and selling feed was concluded. | 27.4.2022 | ||
| The investigation conducted to determine whether feed companies violated the Act no 4054 by means of agreements and/or concerted practices was concluded. On 25.04.2022, the Competition Board decided that A. 1) Abalıoğlu Yem Sanayi A.Ş., 2) C.P. Standart Gıda San. ve Tic. A.Ş., 3) Matlı Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., 4) Erişler Yem San. ve Tic. A.Ş. violated article 4 of the Act no 4054, B. Therefore, administrative fines shall be imposed acc... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning Hayırlı El Kozmetik Pazarlama AŞ Initiated (11.4.2022) | 20.4.2022 | ||
| The Competition Board concluded the preliminary inquiry regarding the claim that Hayırlı El Kozmetik Pazarlama AŞ determined the resale prices of the products sold by the undertakings, which are resellers of Hayırlı El Kozmetik Pazarlama AŞ’s products, and violated the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition. After discussing the information and documents acquired and observations made in the preliminary inquiry in its meeting of 24.03.2022, the Board considered that the findings were s... | |||
| Read | |||
| Hearing for the investigation concerning Biopharma Logistics Uluslararası Taşımacılık Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., Transorient Uluslararası Taşımacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Tunaset Biofarma Lojistik Hizmetleri A.Ş. To be held on May 17, 2022 (12.4.2022) | 20.4.2022 | ||
| The investigation conducted upon the claim that biopharma logistics undertakings titled Biopharma Logistics Uluslararası Taşımacılık Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., Transorient Uluslararası Taşımacılık ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Tunaset Biofarma Lojistik Hizmetleri A.Ş., which carry out qualified local and international door-to-door transportation services for the health sector, violated article 4 of Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition by means of making agreements for customer allocation and imposing... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation concerning Nadirkitap Bilişim ve Reklamcılık AŞ was concluded (12.4.2022) | 15.4.2022 | ||
| The investigation conducted upon the claim that Nadirkitap Bilişim ve Reklamcılık AŞ, which carries out intermediation services in the market for online sales of second hand books via the website called “www.nadirkitap.com”, abused its dominant position by complicating the activities of competing undertakings by means of not providing the data of seller members who want to market their products through competing intermediation service providers, in order to determine whether Nadirkitap Bilişim v... | |||
| Read | |||
| The application concerning the acquisition of the tenancy rights and fixed assets of Ay-mar Ticaret Ltd. Sti.’s 25 stores in Trabzon and Giresun by Migros Ticaret A.Ş. was taken under final examination. | 31.3.2022 | ||
| With the decision dated 17.03.2022 and no 22-13/201-M, the Competition Board took the application concerning the acquisition of the tenancy rights and fixed assets of Ay-mar Ticaret Ltd. Şti.’s 25 stores in Trabzon and Giresun by Migros Ticaret A.Ş. under final examination. As it is known, the Competition Board is in charge of monitoring mergers and/or acquisitions which would result in significant lessening of efficient competition in markets according to article 7 of the Act no 4054 on the ... | |||
| Read | |||