Investigation Initiated Concerning 14 Bakeries Operating in the Didim District of the Aydın Province. (26.7.2013)
Preliminary inquiry conducted in response to the complaint that bakeries operating in the Didim district of the Aydın province conspired to maintain bread prices for was concluded by the Competition Board.
After examining the information, evidence and the findings gathered in the preliminary inquiry in its meeting of 18.07.2013, the Board concluded that the findings were significant and sufficient, and with the decision numbered 13-46/587-M, decided to open an investigation concerning the following undertakings operating in the Didim district of the Aydın province.
- Ay Ekmek ve Unlu Mamuller-Hasan YENİTÜRK,
- Balcı Ekmek ve Unlu Mamulleri-Gökhan BALCI,
- Bulvar Unlu Mamulleri-Gülay KARAKELLE,
- Didima Gıda Üretim Pazarlama Ticaret Turizm İnşaat ve Sanayi Ltd. Şti.,
- Ege Ekmek-İbrahim YARDIMCI,
- Ekin Ekmek Unlu Mamulleri-Şerife AYDOĞDU,
- Gözüm Gıda Turizm Seyahat İnşaat Nakliye Petrol Temizlik Maden İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti.,
- Güroğlu Efecan Ticaret Gıda İnşaat Sanayi Ltd. Şti.,
- Hitit Ekmek ve Unlu Mamulleri-Ali MADAK,
- Mehmet AYDIN-Altınbaşak Ekmek Fırını,
- Müslüm KILIÇ-Kılıçoğlu Unlu Mamuller,
- Özkale Unlu Mamuller İnşaat Turizm Konaklama Ticaret Ltd. Şti.,
- Üç Aslan Unlu Mamuller Gıda Tekstil Emlak İnşaat Seyahat Turizm Nakliyat Hafriyat İthalat İhracat Sanayi Ticaret Ltd. Şti.,
- Yeşil Karadeniz-Hasan MERCAN
Article 4 of the Act no 4054 prohibits all anti-competitive agreements and concerted practices between undertakings. The investigation was launched in order to determine whether the aforementioned bakeries violated article 4 of the Act no 4054 by conspiring to maintain bread prices.
*Investigation decisions taken by the Competition Board are announced to the public following the notification of the decision to the undertakings or associations of undertakings under investigation. These declarations, which are made within the framework of informing the public on Competition Board decisions, can not be interpreted to mean the undertakings or associations of undertakings under investigation have violated the Act no 4054 and that they have faced or will face sanctions under the Act.